Why the AI your company just mandated was designed for a boardroom slide, not your workflow — and how the whole machine keeps spinning.
There's a moment every knowledge worker knows. You open the new tool your company has mandated — the AI assistant, the workflow platform, the "intelligent" something-or-other — and within thirty seconds you understand that nobody who bought this has ever used it. Not once. Not even to check.
This is not an accident.
Buyer Problem
The people who buy software and the people who use software are, in most companies, completely different people with completely different problems.
The buyer's problem is
- How do I look like I'm modernizing?
- How do I get the board off my back about AI?
- How do I justify my budget?
These are legitimate career problems. They just have nothing to do with whether the tool is good.
So when a B2B AI vendor walks into a boardroom, they are not selling a product. They are selling a story that the executive can then retell upward. "We've implemented an AI strategy."
Software is almost incidental — it's a prop in a presentation that hasn't been written yet.
This is why enterprise AI demos are always flawless. They're not showing you the product. They're giving you the slide.
Adoption Gap
The word "adoption" exists to handle the gap between purchase and reality. When a company buys an AI tool and nobody uses it, the vendor does not say "nobody is using this." They say adoption is a journey.
They offer change management resources. They suggest lunch-and-learns.
Adoption is the word that lets everyone pretend the gap between what was promised and what is happening is a people problem rather than a product problem.
And the buyer accepts this framing enthusiastically, because the alternative is admitting they spent several hundred thousand dollars on a demo.
Ask the vendor to show you an everyday user — not a champion, not an executive sponsor — who would be visibly annoyed if the tool was taken away tomorrow. Most can't. They'll show you a champion who championed it, an executive who approved it, a case study from a company you can't contact.
What "It Works" Means
Here is what "it works" means when a CTO says it about an AI product: it does not crash during the board presentation. That's largely it. Whether it saves anyone time, whether the outputs are accurate, whether the people supposedly using it have quietly found workarounds — none of that is tracked with any rigor, because tracking it rigorously creates accountability, and accountability is the enemy of momentum.
This is why AI vendors love talking about time saved. Not measured time. Surveyed time. They ask employees "do you feel like you save time?" after a three-week rollout, and employees — who have correctly identified that this tool is their manager's priority — say yes.
This number goes in the case study. The case study goes on the website. The website convinces the next buyer.
Build for Wrong Audience
The smart vendors learned early that the sale is not to the user, it's to the person one or two levels above the user. So they built products optimized for that audience. Beautiful dashboards showing utilization metrics. Reporting features that surface "AI activity" in a way that looks great in a quarterly review. Integrations with the tools executives actually look at.
The product for the user is often an afterthought dressed up in good fonts. This is why so many AI writing tools produce text that is technically fluent and completely hollow.
The executive doesn't read the output — they read the metric that says outputs were generated.
The number goes up. This is, within the logic of the system, a success.
Not new just louder
None of this is unique to AI, of course. It's the standard lifecycle of any enterprise software category in its gold rush phase. Collaboration tools, digital transformation platforms, data analytics suites — they all went through the same arc. The vocabulary changes but the structure is identical: a buzzword creates board-level anxiety, vendors rush in to sell relief from that anxiety, and the actual workers are handed something that was built for a pitch deck.
What's different with AI is the stakes feel higher, so the anxiety is more acute, so the purchasing is more frantic, so the gap between promise and reality is wider, so the rationalizations have to be more elaborate. The lunch-and-learns are longer. The change management consultants are more expensive. The case studies are more breathless.
That's the product. That's what was bought. Not for you — for the story about you.
No comments:
Post a Comment